2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK vs. 1968 Zastava 1300
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK (192 HP) has 139 more horse power than 1968 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK should accelerate faster than 1968 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK weights approximately 402 kg more than 1968 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK (271 Nm) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK | 1968 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Zastava |
Model | SLK | 1300 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1968 |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 192 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 271 Nm | 93 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1386 kg | 984 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2430 mm |