2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK weights approximately 580 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK | 1982 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mitsubishi |
Model | SLK | Colt |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1244 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1390 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2310 mm |