2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK vs. 2000 Oldsmobile SS

To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Oldsmobile SS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Oldsmobile SS would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Oldsmobile SS (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK. (161 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile SS should accelerate faster than 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK.

Because 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile SS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Oldsmobile SS (318 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK. (241 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Oldsmobile SS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK 2000 Oldsmobile SS
Make Mercedes-Benz Oldsmobile
Model SLK SS
Year Released 2004 2000
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1796 cc 3791 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 161 HP 202 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 241 Nm 318 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 4000 RPM
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 2 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Length 4090 mm 5130 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1900 mm