2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK vs. 2001 Ford Econovan

To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Econovan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Econovan would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK (215 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 2001 Ford Econovan. (96 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Econovan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Econovan weights approximately 30 kg more than 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK (311 Nm) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford Econovan. (155 Nm). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford Econovan.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK 2001 Ford Econovan
Make Mercedes-Benz Ford
Model SLK Econovan
Year Released 2004 2001
Body Type Convertible Van
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3196 cc 1996 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 3 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 215 HP 96 HP
Engine RPM 4200 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 311 Nm 155 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1415 kg 1445 kg
Vehicle Length 4020 mm 4290 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1640 mm
Vehicle Height 1290 mm 1870 mm
Wheelbase Size 2410 mm 2210 mm