2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK vs. 2011 Peugeot RCZ
To start off, 2011 Peugeot RCZ is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Peugeot RCZ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Peugeot RCZ (163 HP) has 2 more horse power than 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK. (161 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Peugeot RCZ should accelerate faster than 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK.
Because 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Peugeot RCZ, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK has automatic transmission and 2011 Peugeot RCZ has manual transmission. 2011 Peugeot RCZ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK | 2011 Peugeot RCZ | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Peugeot |
Model | SLK | RCZ |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 163 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 4287 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1845 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1359 mm |