2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK vs. 2012 Audi RS3
To start off, 2012 Audi RS3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK would be higher. At 5,439 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK (355 HP) has 20 more horse power than 2012 Audi RS3. (335 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK should accelerate faster than 2012 Audi RS3.
Because 2012 Audi RS3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK (500 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Audi RS3. (450 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Audi RS3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK | 2012 Audi RS3 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Audi |
| Model | SLK | RS3 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5439 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 355 HP | 335 HP |
| Torque | 500 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1600 RPM |
| Top Speed | 245 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 4.9 seconds | 4.6 seconds |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 7-speed automated manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
