2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK vs. 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo
To start off, 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo weights approximately 89 kg more than 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK.
Because 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo (540 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK. (450 Nm). This means 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK | 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Lamborghini |
| Model | SLK | Gallardo |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 349 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 8000 RPM |
| Torque | 450 Nm | 540 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1461 kg | 1550 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4345 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1184 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2560 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 10.7 L/100km | 12.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 20.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 80 L |
