2004 Mercedes-Benz V vs. 1962 Cadillac Park Avenue
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz V is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Park Avenue. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Park Avenue would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Park Avenue is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1962 Cadillac Park Avenue is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Cadillac Park Avenue. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mercedes-Benz V | 1962 Cadillac Park Avenue | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Cadillac |
Model | V | Park Avenue |
Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2295 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 3300 mm |