2004 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo vs. 1998 Rover 420
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover 420. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover 420 would be higher. At 1,992 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Rover 420 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo (123 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1998 Rover 420. (87 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover 420. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo weights approximately 191 kg more than 1998 Rover 420. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo (186 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover 420. (184 Nm). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover 420.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo | 1998 Rover 420 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Rover |
Model | Vaneo | 420 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1992 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 87 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque | 186 Nm | 184 Nm |
Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 194 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 1189 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2750 mm |