2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision vs. 1982 Seat Ronda
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Seat Ronda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Seat Ronda would be higher. At 1,689 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision (141 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1982 Seat Ronda. (94 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision should accelerate faster than 1982 Seat Ronda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision weights approximately 509 kg more than 1982 Seat Ronda. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision (300 Nm) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Seat Ronda. (122 Nm). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Seat Ronda.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision | 1982 Seat Ronda | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Seat |
| Model | Vision | Ronda |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1689 cc | 1592 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 300 Nm | 122 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 936 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4020 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2460 mm |
