2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision vs. 2012 Ford Flex
To start off, 2012 Ford Flex is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Ford Flex is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Flex (262 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision. (141 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Flex should accelerate faster than 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Flex weights approximately 583 kg more than 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford Flex (336 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision. (300 Nm). This means 2012 Ford Flex will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision | 2012 Ford Flex | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Ford |
Model | Vision | Flex |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1689 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 262 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 336 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 2028 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 5126 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1928 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2995 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 70 L |