2004 Mercury Marauder vs. 1992 Renault Racoon

To start off, 2004 Mercury Marauder is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Renault Racoon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Renault Racoon would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercury Marauder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercury Marauder (302 HP) has 249 more horse power than 1992 Renault Racoon. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercury Marauder should accelerate faster than 1992 Renault Racoon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercury Marauder weights approximately 900 kg more than 1992 Renault Racoon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1992 Renault Racoon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mercury Marauder. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Renault Racoon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercury Marauder (431 Nm) has 324 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Renault Racoon. (107 Nm). This means 2004 Mercury Marauder will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Renault Racoon. 2004 Mercury Marauder has automatic transmission and 1992 Renault Racoon has manual transmission. 1992 Renault Racoon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Mercury Marauder will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: