2004 Mercury Mountaineer vs. 2008 Suzuki Reno
To start off, 2008 Suzuki Reno is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercury Mountaineer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercury Mountaineer would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercury Mountaineer (239 HP) has 111 more horse power than 2008 Suzuki Reno. (128 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercury Mountaineer should accelerate faster than 2008 Suzuki Reno. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercury Mountaineer weights approximately 855 kg more than 2008 Suzuki Reno. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercury Mountaineer (382 Nm) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Suzuki Reno. (178 Nm). This means 2004 Mercury Mountaineer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Suzuki Reno.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mercury Mountaineer | 2008 Suzuki Reno | |
Make | Mercury | Suzuki |
Model | Mountaineer | Reno |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4604 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 239 HP | 128 HP |
Torque | 382 Nm | 178 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1920 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.8 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 55 L |