2004 Mercury Mountaineer vs. 2009 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2009 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercury Mountaineer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercury Mountaineer would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercury Mountaineer (239 HP) has 64 more horse power than 2009 Jeep Wrangler. (175 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercury Mountaineer should accelerate faster than 2009 Jeep Wrangler. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercury Mountaineer weights approximately 40 kg more than 2009 Jeep Wrangler. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Wrangler (411 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mercury Mountaineer. (382 Nm). This means 2009 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mercury Mountaineer.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mercury Mountaineer | 2009 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Mercury | Jeep |
Model | Mountaineer | Wrangler |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4604 cc | 2777 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 239 HP | 175 HP |
Torque | 382 Nm | 411 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 100 mm |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1920 kg | 1880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 66 L |