2004 Mercury Mountaineer vs. 2010 BMW 125
To start off, 2010 BMW 125 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercury Mountaineer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercury Mountaineer would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercury Mountaineer (239 HP) has 24 more horse power than 2010 BMW 125. (215 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercury Mountaineer should accelerate faster than 2010 BMW 125. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercury Mountaineer weights approximately 395 kg more than 2010 BMW 125. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercury Mountaineer (382 Nm) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 BMW 125. (270 Nm). This means 2004 Mercury Mountaineer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 BMW 125.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mercury Mountaineer | 2010 BMW 125 | |
Make | Mercury | BMW |
Model | Mountaineer | 125 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4604 cc | 2996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 239 HP | 215 HP |
Torque | 382 Nm | 270 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 10.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1920 kg | 1525 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 53 L |