2004 Mercury Mountaineer vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Ford Ecosport is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercury Mountaineer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercury Mountaineer would be higher. At 4,013 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercury Mountaineer (210 HP) has 101 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercury Mountaineer should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2004 Mercury Mountaineer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mercury Mountaineer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mercury Mountaineer | 2010 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Mercury | Ford |
Model | Mountaineer | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4013 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 109 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2490 mm |