2004 Mercury Mountaineer vs. 2011 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2011 Volvo XC60 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercury Mountaineer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercury Mountaineer would be higher. At 4,013 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Volvo XC60 (300 HP) has 90 more horse power than 2004 Mercury Mountaineer. (210 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mercury Mountaineer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercury Mountaineer weights approximately 154 kg more than 2011 Volvo XC60.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Volvo XC60 (440 Nm) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mercury Mountaineer. (344 Nm). This means 2011 Volvo XC60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mercury Mountaineer.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mercury Mountaineer | 2011 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Mercury | Volvo |
Model | Mountaineer | XC60 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4013 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 300 HP |
Torque | 344 Nm | 440 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1921 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1712 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2748 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 70 L |