2004 Mercury Mountaineer vs. 2012 Ford Explorer
To start off, 2012 Ford Explorer is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercury Mountaineer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercury Mountaineer would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Explorer (290 HP) has 51 more horse power than 2004 Mercury Mountaineer. (239 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Explorer should accelerate faster than 2004 Mercury Mountaineer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Explorer weights approximately 147 kg more than 2004 Mercury Mountaineer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercury Mountaineer (382 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Ford Explorer. (345 Nm). This means 2004 Mercury Mountaineer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Ford Explorer.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mercury Mountaineer | 2012 Ford Explorer | |
Make | Mercury | Ford |
Model | Mountaineer | Explorer |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4604 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 239 HP | 290 HP |
Torque | 382 Nm | 345 Nm |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1920 kg | 2067 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 5006 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2004 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1788 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.8 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 70 L |