2004 Mercury Sable vs. 1977 Datsun 260Z
To start off, 2004 Mercury Sable is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Datsun 260Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Datsun 260Z would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Datsun 260Z (163 HP) has 8 more horse power than 2004 Mercury Sable. (155 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1977 Datsun 260Z should accelerate faster than 2004 Mercury Sable. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercury Sable weights approximately 413 kg more than 1977 Datsun 260Z.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercury Sable (251 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Datsun 260Z. (213 Nm). This means 2004 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Datsun 260Z.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mercury Sable | 1977 Datsun 260Z | |
Make | Mercury | Datsun |
Model | Sable | 260Z |
Year Released | 2004 | 1977 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 2565 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 163 HP |
Torque | 251 Nm | 213 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 8.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1513 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4135 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2310 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.2 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.5 L/100km | 12 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 60 L |