2004 Mercury Sable vs. 1986 Mini MK V
To start off, 2004 Mercury Sable is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mini MK V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mini MK V would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercury Sable (200 HP) has 159 more horse power than 1986 Mini MK V. (41 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 1986 Mini MK V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercury Sable weights approximately 879 kg more than 1986 Mini MK V. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercury Sable (271 Nm) has 201 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Mini MK V. (70 Nm). This means 2004 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Mini MK V.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mercury Sable | 1986 Mini MK V | |
| Make | Mercury | Mini |
| Model | Sable | MK V |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2966 cc | 998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 41 HP |
| Torque | 271 Nm | 70 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1504 kg | 625 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2040 mm |
