2004 Mercury Sable vs. 2004 Nissan Armada
To start off, both 2004 Mercury Sable and 2004 Nissan Armada were released in the same year (2004). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP) has 150 more horse power than 2004 Mercury Sable. (155 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2004 Mercury Sable. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 761 kg more than 2004 Mercury Sable. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 271 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mercury Sable. (251 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mercury Sable.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mercury Sable | 2004 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Mercury | Nissan |
Model | Sable | Armada |
Year Released | 2004 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 5556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 305 HP |
Torque | 251 Nm | 522 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 98.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1513 kg | 2274 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.2 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.5 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.8 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 106 L |