2004 Mercury Sable vs. 2008 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2008 Nissan Micra is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercury Sable (155 HP) has 74 more horse power than 2008 Nissan Micra. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 2008 Nissan Micra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercury Sable weights approximately 464 kg more than 2008 Nissan Micra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercury Sable (251 Nm) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan Micra. (185 Nm). This means 2004 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mercury Sable | 2008 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Mercury | Nissan |
Model | Sable | Micra |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 251 Nm | 185 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 76.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 18.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1513 kg | 1049 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 3720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.8 L/100km | 4.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 46 L |