2004 Mercury Sable vs. 2008 Nissan Note
To start off, 2008 Nissan Note is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercury Sable (155 HP) has 68 more horse power than 2008 Nissan Note. (87 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 2008 Nissan Note. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercury Sable weights approximately 346 kg more than 2008 Nissan Note. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercury Sable (251 Nm) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan Note. (128 Nm). This means 2004 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan Note.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mercury Sable | 2008 Nissan Note | |
Make | Mercury | Nissan |
Model | Sable | Note |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 1386 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 87 HP |
Torque | 251 Nm | 128 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 73.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 82.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.9:1 |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1513 kg | 1167 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.8 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 46 L |