2004 Mercury Sable vs. 2009 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2009 Nissan Cube is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercury Sable (155 HP) has 35 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Cube. (120 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Cube.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercury Sable (251 Nm) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan Cube. (127 Nm). This means 2004 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan Cube.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mercury Sable | 2009 Nissan Cube | |
| Make | Mercury | Nissan |
| Model | Sable | Cube |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2983 cc | 1797 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 155 HP | 120 HP |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 127 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.8 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 82 L |
