2004 Mercury Sable vs. 2009 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2009 SsangYong Musso is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercury Sable (155 HP) has 36 more horse power than 2009 SsangYong Musso. (119 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 2009 SsangYong Musso. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 SsangYong Musso weights approximately 488 kg more than 2004 Mercury Sable.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercury Sable (251 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 SsangYong Musso. (250 Nm). This means 2004 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 SsangYong Musso.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mercury Sable | 2009 SsangYong Musso | |
Make | Mercury | SsangYong |
Model | Sable | Musso |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 2874 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 119 HP |
Torque | 251 Nm | 250 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 92.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 22.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1513 kg | 2001 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.8 L/100km | 13.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 70 L |