2004 Mercury Sable vs. 2010 Honda Fit
To start off, 2010 Honda Fit is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercury Sable (200 HP) has 83 more horse power than 2010 Honda Fit. (117 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 2010 Honda Fit. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercury Sable weights approximately 361 kg more than 2010 Honda Fit. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercury Sable (271 Nm) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Honda Fit. (144 Nm). This means 2004 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Honda Fit.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mercury Sable | 2010 Honda Fit | |
Make | Mercury | Honda |
Model | Sable | Fit |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 117 HP |
Torque | 271 Nm | 144 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1504 kg | 1143 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4105 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1694 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1524 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2499 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.7 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 40 L |