2004 Mercury Sable vs. 2010 Lexus HS
To start off, 2010 Lexus HS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Lexus HS (187 HP) has 32 more horse power than 2004 Mercury Sable. (155 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Lexus HS should accelerate faster than 2004 Mercury Sable. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Lexus HS weights approximately 157 kg more than 2004 Mercury Sable. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mercury Sable | 2010 Lexus HS | |
| Make | Mercury | Lexus |
| Model | Sable | HS |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2983 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 155 HP | 187 HP |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1513 kg | 1670 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4694 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1786 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1506 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.2 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 12.5 L/100km | 6.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 55 L |
