2004 Mercury Sable vs. 2010 Seat Leon
To start off, 2010 Seat Leon is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercury Sable (155 HP) has 17 more horse power than 2010 Seat Leon. (138 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 2010 Seat Leon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercury Sable weights approximately 158 kg more than 2010 Seat Leon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Seat Leon (320 Nm) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mercury Sable. (251 Nm). This means 2010 Seat Leon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mercury Sable.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mercury Sable | 2010 Seat Leon | |
Make | Mercury | Seat |
Model | Sable | Leon |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 1968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 251 Nm | 320 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 81.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 95.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 18.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1513 kg | 1355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.8 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 55 L |