2004 Mercury Sable vs. 2011 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2011 GMC Sierra is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 GMC Sierra (403 HP) has 248 more horse power than 2004 Mercury Sable. (155 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 2004 Mercury Sable. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 GMC Sierra weights approximately 839 kg more than 2004 Mercury Sable. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 GMC Sierra (565 Nm) has 314 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mercury Sable. (251 Nm). This means 2011 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mercury Sable.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mercury Sable | 2011 GMC Sierra | |
Make | Mercury | GMC |
Model | Sable | Sierra |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 403 HP |
Torque | 251 Nm | 565 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1513 kg | 2352 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 5839 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2032 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1875 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3645 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.2 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.5 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 98 L |