2004 Mercury Sable vs. 2011 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 2011 SsangYong Korando is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercury Sable (200 HP) has 25 more horse power than 2011 SsangYong Korando. (175 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 2011 SsangYong Korando.
Because 2011 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mercury Sable. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mercury Sable | 2011 SsangYong Korando | |
| Make | Mercury | SsangYong |
| Model | Sable | Korando |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2966 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 175 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4410 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 6.1 L/100km |
