2004 MG TF vs. 1962 Renault 8
To start off, 2004 MG TF is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Renault 8 would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 MG TF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 MG TF (114 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1962 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 MG TF should accelerate faster than 1962 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 MG TF weights approximately 360 kg more than 1962 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 MG TF | 1962 Renault 8 | |
| Make | MG | Renault |
| Model | TF | 8 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1588 cc | 956 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2280 mm |
