2004 MG TF vs. 1965 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 2004 MG TF is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2004 MG TF. (158 HP @ 6900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 2004 MG TF. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 MG TF weights approximately 50 kg more than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 MG TF | 1965 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | MG | Sunbeam |
Model | TF | Tiger |
Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
Body Type | Roadster | Roadster |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 4261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 6900 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2190 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 27 L |