2004 MG TF vs. 1995 Nissan CQ-X
To start off, 2004 MG TF is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Nissan CQ-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Nissan CQ-X would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Nissan CQ-X is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 MG TF weights approximately 338 kg more than 1995 Nissan CQ-X.
Because 2004 MG TF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 MG TF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Nissan CQ-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1995 Nissan CQ-X has automatic transmission and 2004 MG TF has manual transmission. 2004 MG TF will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Nissan CQ-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 MG TF | 1995 Nissan CQ-X | |
Make | MG | Nissan |
Model | TF | CQ-X |
Year Released | 2004 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 0 HP |
Top Speed | 220 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 852 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2530 mm |