2004 MG TF vs. 1995 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2004 MG TF is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Nissan Pulsar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 MG TF (114 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1995 Nissan Pulsar. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 MG TF should accelerate faster than 1995 Nissan Pulsar.
Because 2004 MG TF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 MG TF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Nissan Pulsar (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MG TF. (145 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 1995 Nissan Pulsar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MG TF.
Compare all specifications:
2004 MG TF | 1995 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | MG | Nissan |
Model | TF | Pulsar |
Year Released | 2004 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2440 mm |