2004 MG TF vs. 2000 Ford Windstar
To start off, 2004 MG TF is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Windstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Windstar would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Windstar (150 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2004 MG TF. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Windstar should accelerate faster than 2004 MG TF.
Because 2004 MG TF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 MG TF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 MG TF | 2000 Ford Windstar | |
| Make | MG | Ford |
| Model | TF | Windstar |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1796 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 5103 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1946 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 3066 mm |
