2004 MG TF vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 MG TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 MG TF would be higher. At 1,598 cc, 2008 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 MG TF weights approximately 30 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Because 2004 MG TF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 MG TF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Renault Clio (148 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MG TF. (145 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 2008 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MG TF.
Compare all specifications:
2004 MG TF | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | MG | Renault |
Model | TF | Clio |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1598 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.1 mm | 79.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.8 seconds | 9.6 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.1 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 50 L |