2004 MG ZS vs. 1963 Plymouth Valiant
To start off, 2004 MG ZS is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 3,689 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Plymouth Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Plymouth Valiant weights approximately 230 kg more than 2004 MG ZS.
Because 1963 Plymouth Valiant is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Plymouth Valiant. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 MG ZS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 MG ZS | 1963 Plymouth Valiant | |
Make | MG | Plymouth |
Model | ZS | Valiant |
Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 3689 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1075 kg | 1305 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2700 mm |