2004 MG ZS vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2004 MG ZS is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Triumph 2000 (130 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2004 MG ZS. (100 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 2004 MG ZS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 100 kg more than 2004 MG ZS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 MG ZS (240 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2004 MG ZS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2004 MG ZS | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | MG | Triumph |
Model | ZS | 2000 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1993 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1095 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2700 mm |