2004 MG ZS vs. 1972 Zastava 1300

To start off, 2004 MG ZS is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 MG ZS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 MG ZS (100 HP) has 47 more horse power than 1972 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 MG ZS should accelerate faster than 1972 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 MG ZS weights approximately 115 kg more than 1972 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1972 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 MG ZS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 MG ZS (241 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2004 MG ZS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Zastava 1300.

Compare all specifications: