2004 MG ZS vs. 1976 Zastava 1500

To start off, 2004 MG ZS is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 2,495 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 MG ZS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 MG ZS (175 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1976 Zastava 1500. (70 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 MG ZS should accelerate faster than 1976 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 MG ZS weights approximately 135 kg more than 1976 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1976 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 MG ZS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 MG ZS (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Zastava 1500. (113 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2004 MG ZS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Zastava 1500.

Compare all specifications: