2004 MG ZS vs. 2003 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2004 MG ZS is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Westfield XTR 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Westfield XTR 2 would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 MG ZS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Westfield XTR 2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 MG ZS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 MG ZS | 2003 Westfield XTR 2 | |
| Make | MG | Westfield |
| Model | ZS | XTR 2 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 1994 cc | 1779 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2320 mm |
