2004 MG ZS vs. 2006 SsangYong Stavic
To start off, 2006 SsangYong Stavic is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 MG ZS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 MG ZS would be higher. At 3,197 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 SsangYong Stavic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 SsangYong Stavic (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2004 MG ZS. (175 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 SsangYong Stavic should accelerate faster than 2004 MG ZS.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 SsangYong Stavic (312 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MG ZS. (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 SsangYong Stavic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MG ZS. 2006 SsangYong Stavic has automatic transmission and 2004 MG ZS has manual transmission. 2004 MG ZS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 SsangYong Stavic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 MG ZS | 2006 SsangYong Stavic | |
Make | MG | SsangYong |
Model | ZS | Stavic |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2495 cc | 3197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 89.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.8 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 80 L |