2004 MG ZS vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 MG ZS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 MG ZS would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 2004 MG ZS. (100 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2004 MG ZS.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 MG ZS (241 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2004 MG ZS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
2004 MG ZS | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | MG | Ford |
Model | ZS | E-350 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 241 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2619 mm |