2004 MG ZS vs. 2012 Mazda 3

To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 MG ZS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 MG ZS would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2004 MG ZS. (100 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2004 MG ZS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda 3 weights approximately 205 kg more than 2004 MG ZS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 MG ZS (240 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Mazda 3. (183 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2004 MG ZS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Mazda 3.

Compare all specifications:

2004 MG ZS 2012 Mazda 3
Make MG Mazda
Model ZS 3
Year Released 2004 2012
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1993 cc 2000 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 100 HP 148 HP
Engine RPM 4200 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 240 Nm 183 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 4500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual 5-speed manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1095 kg 1300 kg
Vehicle Length 4550 mm 4590 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 1755 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1471 mm
Wheelbase Size 2630 mm 2639 mm