2004 MG ZS vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 MG ZS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 MG ZS would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ATS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ATS (199 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2004 MG ZS. (175 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS should accelerate faster than 2004 MG ZS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ATS weights approximately 358 kg more than 2004 MG ZS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Cadillac ATS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Cadillac ATS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 MG ZS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ATS (258 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MG ZS. (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac ATS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MG ZS. 2013 Cadillac ATS has automatic transmission and 2004 MG ZS has manual transmission. 2004 MG ZS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac ATS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 MG ZS | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
Make | MG | Cadillac |
Model | ZS | ATS |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2495 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 199 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 258 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.8 mm | 101 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 11.4 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1503 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4643 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1418 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2776 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 61 L |