2004 MG ZT-T vs. 1962 TVR Grantura
To start off, 2004 MG ZT-T is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 TVR Grantura. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 TVR Grantura would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 MG ZT-T is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 MG ZT-T weights approximately 885 kg more than 1962 TVR Grantura.
Because 1962 TVR Grantura is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 TVR Grantura. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 MG ZT-T, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 MG ZT-T | 1962 TVR Grantura | |
Make | MG | TVR |
Model | ZT-T | Grantura |
Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1339 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1625 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1230 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 65 L |