2004 MG ZT-T vs. 1982 Volvo 360
To start off, 2004 MG ZT-T is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volvo 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volvo 360 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 MG ZT-T is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 MG ZT-T (187 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1982 Volvo 360. (101 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 MG ZT-T should accelerate faster than 1982 Volvo 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 MG ZT-T weights approximately 525 kg more than 1982 Volvo 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 MG ZT-T (250 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Volvo 360. (163 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2004 MG ZT-T will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Volvo 360.
Compare all specifications:
2004 MG ZT-T | 1982 Volvo 360 | |
Make | MG | Volvo |
Model | ZT-T | 360 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 250 Nm | 163 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.8 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1625 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 58 L |