2004 MG ZT-T vs. 2011 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2011 Holden Colorado is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 MG ZT-T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 MG ZT-T would be higher. At 3,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 MG ZT-T (187 HP) has 26 more horse power than 2011 Holden Colorado. (161 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 MG ZT-T should accelerate faster than 2011 Holden Colorado.
Because 2011 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 MG ZT-T, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Colorado (360 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MG ZT-T. (250 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MG ZT-T.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 MG ZT-T | 2011 Holden Colorado | |
| Make | MG | Holden |
| Model | ZT-T | Colorado |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 161 HP |
| Torque | 250 Nm | 360 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
