2004 MG ZT vs. 1996 Volvo 850

To start off, 2004 MG ZT is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Volvo 850. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Volvo 850 would be higher. At 2,495 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 MG ZT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 MG ZT (175 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1996 Volvo 850. (124 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 MG ZT should accelerate faster than 1996 Volvo 850. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 MG ZT weights approximately 95 kg more than 1996 Volvo 850. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 MG ZT (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Volvo 850. (170 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2004 MG ZT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Volvo 850. 2004 MG ZT has automatic transmission and 1996 Volvo 850 has manual transmission. 1996 Volvo 850 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 MG ZT will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: