2004 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn would be higher. At 4,255 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn weights approximately 810 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mitsubishi Colt | 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Colt | Silver Dawn |
Year Released | 2004 | 1952 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1493 cc | 4255 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 5170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 108 L |